Garmin Forerunner 165
vs
Google Pixel Watch 3

Quick Verdict

Winner: Google Pixel Watch 3

Its advanced features and comprehensive health tracking capabilities offer more value despite its higher price.

Key Differences

• Price: The Google Pixel Watch 3 is £100 more expensive than the Garmin Forerunner 165.
• Display: Both feature AMOLED displays, but the Pixel Watch 3 has a higher resolution.
• Features: The Pixel Watch 3 includes cellular connectivity, more storage, and a wider range of health tracking features.

Design & Build

The Garmin Forerunner 165 and Google Pixel Watch 3 both offer sleek, modern designs with durable builds. The Pixel Watch 3 is lighter at 36 grams, enhancing wearer comfort over long periods. Both watches have AMOLED displays, but the Pixel Watch 3 boasts a higher resolution, offering sharper images and text. The design preferences may vary, but the Pixel Watch 3 edges out with its lighter build and clearer display.

Performance

The Garmin Forerunner 165 focuses on running and fitness tracking, offering detailed performance metrics and training plans. In contrast, the Google Pixel Watch 3 delivers a broader smartwatch experience with seamless smartphone integration and AI-powered insights. The Pixel Watch operates on Wear OS, providing a more versatile platform for apps and notifications. The Forerunner 165 excels in battery life, lasting up to 11 days compared to the Pixel Watch 3's 24 hours.

Features

• Garmin Forerunner 165: Specialised in running metrics, training plans, and long battery life.
• Google Pixel Watch 3: Comprehensive health tracking, including heart rate, blood oxygen, and sleep tracking, cellular connectivity, and NFC payments.

Best For

Garmin Forerunner 165: Runners looking for detailed training insights and long battery life.

Google Pixel Watch 3: Tech-savvy users seeking a feature-rich smartwatch with comprehensive health tracking.

Value Analysis

The Google Pixel Watch 3 commands a higher price, but offers a wider range of features, including cellular connectivity, more storage, and comprehensive health tracking. The Garmin Forerunner 165, while cheaper, is focused more narrowly on running and fitness. The choice between them depends on whether you value a broad smartwatch experience over specialised fitness tracking.

Final Recommendation

For those seeking a versatile smartwatch with advanced health tracking, the Google Pixel Watch 3 is the better choice despite its higher cost. If your primary interest lies in running and battery life, the Garmin Forerunner 165 offers excellent value.